Creating a new item
I'd perfer if it was just called Solo NOTs. When one says something is "new" it implies something else is "old."
Better we have Original OT VII and Solo NOTs VII.
Solo NOTs Training and before that Audited NOTs.
We don't want to drop out the Original OT VII like the RTC did with their bridge. It is too valuable a step to ignore or waste. We need a bridge that we can agree on.
The 1981 Bridge had the original OT grads, IV, V, VI, and VII, and had NOTs above that.
Current practice is to take someone from OT III and go directly to NOTs.
There is c/s discretion here. On the 1981 bridge not every pc could really do the original bridge, it was too steep a gradient.
The discretion is based on the pc's drug history and his ability to operate exterior.
Personally I feel that anyone who went Dianetic clear, if they don't have a heavy drug case, benefits greatly by doing the Original OT IV. It proofs up a being so they won't become effect of implants in the future.
Isn't there something that can be done about autormatic interruptions of the flow. I don't need in the middle of a sentence having some datum interjected that makes the sentence incomprehensible. See 2nd paragraph from the bottom.
Pat
Are you talking about this discussion thread Pat or on Roy's article?
Discussion thread. This was some time ago, first article I wrote. When I came to read it automatic inserts for source materials were interjected, spoiling the smoothness of the read.
I understand you like to have long uninterrupted text, but that is not very readable or interesting for most people. Using Headings and inserting links into the text make the topic more readable...IMO. You are free to publish however you wish but you could look at any Wikipedia article to see what I am talking about. That's what we are trying to emulate to a large degree.