|Type of Article||Category:Organizing|
The Scientology Admin Scale was developed by L Ron Hubbard to help organize activities, groups or organizations. It provides a logical framework for advancing any activity, not just those related to Scientology.
- "I have developed a scale for use which gives a sequence (and relative seniority) of subjects relating to organization.
- "This scale is worked up and worked down UNTIL IT IS (EACH ITEM) IN FULL AGREEMENT WITH THE REMAINING ITEMS." 
Goals[edit | edit source]
Here are the goals that LRH had for Scientology (not that they are reflected in the current Corporate Church of Scientology):
- "To Clear the Planet".
- The goal of Scientology is making the individual capable of living a better life in his own estimation and with his fellows and the playing of a better game. 
- Scientologists consistently creating a future of improved lives(conditions) through the use of Scientology. (This belongs under ideal scene)
- The creation of a network of training centers and auditors world wide using standard and original Scientology as codified by LRH. Working in tandem, qualifying one another's products as valid and correcting one another acceptingly per qualifications references on the subject. (This could be a target)
- The dissemination of LRH tech into society, at all levels,to improve conditions and help people.
Opinion: These are INTERNAL goals. Goals that might appeal to an experienced Scientologist. They are not EXTERNAL goals. External goals that might appeal to people who have 1) no exposure to the subject. 2) those whose only exposure is the well documented failures of the orgs and the people. What is important about goals? That they are attainable. That they are compelling to the person holding the goal. That they are well defined with measurable steps toward their fulfillment. That they are desirable and a call toward mass adoption. If there were goals that would present non-Scientologists with WIIFM (WhatsInItForMe) statements maybe there will be change. In other words, people need to be drawn toward something personal.
We exist to create:
- Places where you can come to feel welcomed.
- Places where you can come to learn about what makes you and those you care about tick.
- Places where you can come to gain shelter from this stressful world.
- Places where you can come to feel excitement and joy.
- Places where...
You know? Ideas like that...
Purposes[edit | edit source]
- To have a civilization without criminality, insanity and war, where honest beings can have rights.
- Aid one another in applying Scientology to one another's lives using standard Scientology Technology.
- Moved this to purposes to make it align properly. Its not a goal its a purpose.
- To ensure that the technology of Dianetics and Scientology are available and used in the community for the good of mankind.
- To ensure that both training and auditing is available to all who wish to take advantage of them for the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics.
- That the technology of Dianetics and Scientology is preserved in the public domain and made available to all that wish to use it in a standard manner as directed by L Ron Hubbards policies and HCOB's.
- To hold together as a cohesive group that people can come to for standard Scientology as written by L Ron Hubbard.
- To be a safe point for the technology of Scientology as written by L Ron Hubbard that enables its continued use and growth outside of the Church of Scientology.
The above six are combined in the following :
Maintaining a cohesive group outside the Church of Scientology, to ensure that the standard technology of training and auditing of Dianetics and Scientology are kept freely available and continually expanding in their used for the the greatest good for the greatest number, benefiting all mankind individually and collectively; as directed by unaltered instructions left by LRH .
Policy[edit | edit source]
- THE CODE OF A SCIENTOLOGIST - 1969
(The agreements, purposes and moral code which unites all who call themselves 'Scientologist' - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 13 SEP 54 - THE CREED OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
(Goes with the Code of a Scientologist - actually can be part of our purposes - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 15 NOV 68 - DISCONNECTION CANCELED
(Are we serious about reform and inclusion? We really can handle all cases - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 30 JUL 64 - GRADATION PROGRAM, REVISED
(Would put to rest questions of using any of the tech, anywhere: "...I nevertheless do not feel right about telling Scientologists that there are certain materials they cannot use or be audited on. I would rather leave this matter wholly to personal experience of others and make the gradation program only a recommendation not a directive... 5. That the gradation program is only a recommended route for best results." - LRH - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 10 DEC 69 - SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE
(Specifies the correct relationship between the org and the field - Makes the org responsible for upholding high standards, not trying to enforce them on the field - Gives people the org as a stable place to go to get their cases straightened out - added by Scott Gordon)
(NB - There are no "orgs" in the independent field [outside of ROs] so this relationship is moot; further, it doesn't mean that the field should apply wobbly-bobbly or loosey-goosey tech; LRH's standards for Scientology are for everyone everywhere.)Standardtechauditor 20:56, 14 July 2013 (MDT)Chris Black
- HCO PL 28 APR 82 - THE RIGHTS OF THE FIELD AUDITOR
(Taken from PAB 112 - May 57 - So cancel the RTRC note at top - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 19 MAR 68 - SERVICE
(When all else fails... - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 10 JUN 60 - WHAT WE EXPECT OF A SCIENTOLOGIST
(makes almost any method of sincere participation, 'right' - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 22 JULY 63 - YOU CAN BE RIGHT
(How to handle people - added by Scott Gordon)
- HCO PL 15 AUG 65 - THINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE
(Isn't this simple policy adequate to cover the handling of ethics reports in the field? - added by Scott Gordon)
- Lecture 6504C06, lecture 420 of the Briefing Course, “Org Board and Livingness” - added by (?)
- 1968 AUDITOR'S CODE (makes it the responsibility of every auditor/practitioner to deliver only standard technology as per standard case supervision data.)Standardtechauditor 20:56, 14 July 2013 (MDT)Chris Black
Standardtechauditor 20:21, 23 July 2013 (MDT) LRH ED 67 INT "HOW TO RAISE STATS" Standardtechauditor 20:21, 23 July 2013 (MDT)
admin plan[edit | edit source]
To create an "Admin Scale for Non Corporate Scientologists to ensure the future preservation of LRH Tech outside the church." To unite all small groups of Scientologists around the world into this project so that we can all agree that this is our Admin Scale.
Admin Scale program[edit | edit source]
Widely promote the admin scale to all interested parties.
admin scale project[edit | edit source]
admin scale orders[edit | edit source]
- Put together survey/s to find out what is needed and wanted by those whom are unaware of the existence or the purpose of this admin scale project so as to increase the cooperation and coordination of the field to 1) be more cause on all the dynamics; 2) get more Scientology done and 3) have an expanding Scientology field that result in more fun in the games of life.
- Appoint persons responsible for the promotion of the admin scale via Independent Facebook groups and message boards, blogs etc. Create a volunteers' org board so that the above can be done.
I will readily admit that I never ever read the entirety of the GREEN VOLUMES. I did spend 35 years in business. Financial services to be specific. That is a highly regulated field. I can also tell you that having understood organizations and people in organizations could never ever possibly operate with any efficiency with the heaviness of regulations that are contained in the GREEN VOLUMES. That is an unworkable technology. Just as an example, the basic staff volume is 853 pages in length. How is a person to operate efficiently when burdened with so much regulation. They challenge the actual technology in scope and depth. The Exec volume? 446 pages. Management Series? 1448 pages. The Divisions 1-7? 6,946. In total 9,693. That challenges the Federal Register in many ways.
tech preservation plan[edit | edit source]
tech preservation program[edit | edit source]
- Gather all known LRH recorded data and preserve it a raw data base.
- LRH Book Restoration Program - The basic books of Dianetics and Scientology are out of print. the church, owners of the copyrights, having released bastardized and fraudulent reproductions of the original books, has effectively destroyed the very foundation of Scientlogy. Anyone who doubts the situation is a dire as stated above can look at the first phase or project involved in this Restoration Program. i.e. the LRH Book Alterations Project".
Tech Preservation projects[edit | edit source]
- The LRH Book Alterations Project is a project to document the fraudulent and criminal destruction of the published books of L Ron Hubbard.
safe point plan[edit | edit source]
To create a safe environment for the rest of the admin scale to be executed.
safe point program[edit | edit source]
safe point projects[edit | edit source]
tech collation plan[edit | edit source]
To package data pertinent to the public the data is being collated for.
tech collation program[edit | edit source]
tech collection projects[edit | edit source]
tech promotion and dissemination plan[edit | edit source]
Enlighten other in it value and potential results and making the needed and wanted tech available.
tech promotion and dissemination program[edit | edit source]
tech promotion and dissemination projects[edit | edit source]
training plan[edit | edit source]
Ensuring the technology is properly duplicated and able to be applied.
metering films program[edit | edit source]
meter reads drill film project[edit | edit source]
This project is DONE although the film will be upgraded and improved as time goes by, it is available NOW and has already improved the training and abilities of auditors around the world! see the film HERE
auditing plan[edit | edit source]
Get er done!
auditing program[edit | edit source]
auditing projects[edit | edit source]
Qual plan[edit | edit source]
Providing an on policy manner of identification, correction of delivery that violate the Purposes and Goals as defined above.
qual program[edit | edit source]
qual projects[edit | edit source]
Undercut plan[edit | edit source]
To get the underlying issues stopping the expansion of present scene towards the ideal scene.
undercut program[edit | edit source]
undercut projects[edit | edit source]
Coordination plan[edit | edit source]
to get acknowledge the products of the individuals and group/s and get agreement of future planning.
coordination program[edit | edit source]
coordination projects[edit | edit source]
ARC Plan[edit | edit source]
To use the tech to increase ARC for the benefit of all individuals and the overall groups.
arc program[edit | edit source]
arc projects[edit | edit source]
Programs[edit | edit source]
Projects[edit | edit source]
Orders[edit | edit source]
Ideal Scenes[edit | edit source]
Environment free of Misunderstood word.
Harmony of theta and mest increasing to create expansion of life impulses.
Truth be acknowledged on all levels of the Dynamics. Standardtechauditor 17:57, 22 July 2013 (MDT) Nice, but also can be personal, IMO. Standardtechauditor 17:57, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
Knowledge disseminated freely to those whom seek it.
Civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to right to greater heights (from VFP posting)
Standardtechauditor 17:57, 22 July 2013 (MDT) Scientology being applied standardly (as contained in LRH HCOBs) in auditing practices and course rooms in the independent field. Standardtechauditor 17:57, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
Stats[edit | edit source]
- Independent Groups formed and active
- Number of bridge steps taken
- Well done auditing hours.
Standardtechauditor 17:52, 22 July 2013 (MDT) "Number of new persons routed onto course or auditing in a standard independent field practice." Standardtechauditor 17:52, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
Standardtechauditor 17:53, 22 July 2013 (MDT) There is also (from a Div 6 viewpoint) "Number of recovered Scientologists moving again on the Bridge." Standardtechauditor 17:53, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
Valuable Final Products[edit | edit source]
1.) Releases, Clears and OTs
2.) A person/being who is rehabilitated through standard technical and administrative Scientological methods without evaluation or invalidation, on their own determinism, after having their purposes blunted while trying to do Scientology in what is now the Corporate entity known as Corporate Scientology or in the field by something less than standard technical application in practice or even in conversation. This rehabilitation resurrects their fundamental reach for the bridge and moving on it through courses, auditing, and ultimately applying it in their everyday lives and to others, winning thru the application of Scientology.Burkejon 15:22, 10 July 2013 (MDT) Standardtechauditor 17:45, 22 July 2013 (MDT)I think this is a bit long and part of it isn't a VFP, but a doingness. What is it that is being envisioned? What about something like "A rehabilitated Scientologist with rekindled purposes who is now progressing on the Bridge and making gains through standard application of Scientology in their lives." Or something to that effect. Standardtechauditor 17:45, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
3.) New public interested in Scientology therapy and tech and routed onto course in an Independent courseroom or to an independent auditor. Standardtechauditor 17:46, 22 July 2013 (MDT) This is more a stat than a VFP. Also, IMO, I'm not all that thrilled with using the word "therapy" as it triggers other connections. So what about something like "New people interested in Scientology and moving up both sides of the Bridge in the independent field." Standardtechauditor 17:46, 22 July 2013 (MDT)
4.) Persons/Beings who are Able and Causative who will work towards the ideal scene of a civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to right to greater heights.
references[edit | edit source]
|How Plans, Programs and Projects can be run with a wiki.|
definitions[edit | edit source]
Goals[edit | edit source]
Defined as: A known objective toward which an action is directed with the purpose of achieving that end.
Purposes[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. The lesser goal applying to specific activities or subjects. (HCO PL 6 Dec 70) 2. The entire concept of an ideal scene for any activity is really a clean statement of its purpose. (HCO PL 5 Jul 70)
policy[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. Policy as a word has many definitions in current dictionaries amongst which only one is partially correct: "a definite course or method of action to guide and determine future decisions." It is also "prudence or wisdom," "a course of action," and a lot of other things according to the dictionary. It even is said to be laid down at the top. Therefore the word has so many other meanings that the language itself has become confused. Yet, regardless of dictionary fog, the word means an exact thing in the specialized field of management and organization. Policy means the principle evolved and issued by top management for a specific activity to guide planning and programming and authorize the issuance of projects by executives which in turn permit the issuance and enforcement of orders that direct the activity of personnel in achieving production and viability. Policy is therefore a principle by which the conduct of affairs can be guided. (HCO PL 25 Nov 70)
Plans[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. Short range broad intentions as to the contemplated actions envisaged for the handling of a broad area to remedy it or expand it or to obstruct or impede an opposition to expansion. A plan is usually based on observation of potentials (or resources) and expresses a bright idea of how to use them. It always proceeds from a real why if it is to be successful. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 2. the general bright idea one has to remedy the why found and get things up to the ideal scene or improve even that. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 3. plans are not targets. All manner of plans can be drawn and can be okayed. But this does not authorize their execution. They are just plans. When and how they will be done and by whom has not been established, scheduled or authorized. You could plan to make a million dollars but if when, how and who were not set as targets of different types, it just wouldn't happen. (HCO PL 18 Jan 69 II) 4. a plan, by which is meant the drawing or scale modeling of some area, project, or thing, is of course a vital necessity in any construction and construction fails without it. A plan would be the design of the thing itself. (HCO PL 18 Jan 69 II)
programs[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. A series of steps in sequence to carry out a plan. One usually sees a program following the discovery of a why. But in actual fact a plan had to exist in the person's mind whether written or not before a program could be written. A program, thus, carries out the plan conceived to handle a found why. A plan and its program require authorization (or OK) from the central or coordinating authority of the general activities of a group before they can be invested in, activated or executed. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 2. the sequence of flows and the changes or actions at each point plotted against time are in fact the major sequences and programs of a group. (HCO PL 1 Oct 70) 3. the complete or outline of a complete target series containing all types. (HCO PL 24 Jan 69) 4. complete planning and programs are synonymous at this time and programs is the preferred word. (HCO PL 24 Jan 69)
projects[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. The sequence of steps written to carry out one step of a program. Project orders often have to be written to execute a program step. These should be written but usually do not require any approval and often are not generally issued but go to the person or persons who will accomplish that step of a program. Under the category of project would come orders, work projects, etc. These are a series of guiding steps which if followed will result in a full and successful accomplishment of the program target. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 2. the program is the big solution to a problem-the big problem is solved by a big solution called a program. The little problems inside that big solution are solved by projects. And inside the projects the littler-littler problems are solved by orders. (FO 2192) 3. if something requires more than two weeks to do it is a project. (HCO PL 1 May 65 II) Abbr.
orders[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. The verbal or written direction from a lower or designated authority to carry out a program step or apply the general policy. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 2. some program steps are so simple that they are themselves an order or an order can simply be a roughly written project. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 3. the program step itself or the verbal or written project to get the program step fully done. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 4. the direction or command issued by an authorized person to a person or group within the sphere of the authorized person's authority. By implication an order goes from a senior to juniors. (HCO PL 25 Nov 70) 5. policy is the broad general outline originated by top management. Orders are the instructions issued by the next lower level of management to get things done that result in products. (FBDL 12) 6. orders are what are issued to get the actions called for in policy done so that a product results.!
ideal scenes[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1.The entire concept of an ideal scene for any activity is really a clean statement of its purpose. (HCO PL 5 Jul 70) 2. The state of affairs envisioned by policy or the improvement of even that. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II)
stats[edit | edit source]
Defined as: 1. The relative rise or fall of a quantity compared to an earlier moment in time. If a section moved ten tons last week and 12 tons this week, the statistic is rising. If a section moved ten tons last week and only eight tons this week the statistic is falling. (HCO PL 30 Jan 66) 2. a number or amount compared to an earlier number or amount of the same thing. Statistics refer to the quantity of work done or the value of it in money. (HCO PL 16 Dec 65) 3. a tight reality, a stable point, which is to measure any departure from the ideal scene. (HCO PL 6 Jul 70) 4. a positive numerical thing that can be accurately counted and graphed on a two dimensional thing. (HCO PL 6 Jul 70) 5. the statistic measures directly the relative survival potential of the organism or its part. (HCO PL 6 Jul 70) 6. the only sound measure of any production or any job or any activity. (HCO PL 5 Jul 70) 7. the most direct observation in an org (or a country) is statistics. These tell of production. They measure what is done. (HCO PL 5 Feb 70) 8. a difference between two or more periods in time so is always comparative. (HCO PL 6 Nov 66 I) 9. the independent continuing survey of production or lack of it. (HCO PL 29 Feb 72 II) 10. a stat actually should consist of volume, quality and viability. (FEBC 12, 7102CO3 SO II) Abbr. Stat.
Valuable Final Products[edit | edit source]
Defined as: Something that can be exchanged with other activities in return for support. The support usually adds up to food, clothing, shelter, money, tolerance and cooperation (goodwill). (HCO PL 25 Mar 71) 2. could as easily be named a valuable exchangeable product. WO PL 25 Mar 71) 3. one you can exchange with the society for the wherewithal which the society has. By definition it is something for which you can exchange the services and goods of the society. (FEBC 12, 7102CO3 SO II) 4. something that can be translated into the society for the wherewithal to survive. WEBC 4, 7101C18 SO III) Abbr. VFP.
comments[edit | edit source]
Post comments here or use the "Discussion" Tab above for more flexible discussion of the various parts of this project.comments powered by Disqus