Creating a new item
Roy, I notice you added "on New OT 7" to the case level field. That won't work in the long run although it doesn't break anything either. It's just not a field that was designed for custom input. I totally get why you would like to make that distinction so just leave it for now until I figure out a better way to capture that.
For Future reference, you can post requests for additions like that at the Support page, on the Blog page I just created or click on my user name and leave me a message there.
Hi Dave,
New OT 7 is a fairly common level. I'd like it to stay, as a lot of church evacuee's know what it is.
thanks.
I'd perfer if it was just called Solo NOTs. When one says something is "new" it implies something else is "old."
Better we have Original OT VII and Solo NOTs VII.
Solo NOTs Training and before that Audited NOTs.
We don't want to drop out the Original OT VII like the RTC did with their bridge. It is too valuable a step to ignore or waste. We need a bridge that we can agree on.
The 1981 Bridge had the original OT grads, IV, V, VI, and VII, and had NOTs above that.
Current practice is to take someone from OT III and go directly to NOTs.
There is c/s discretion here. On the 1981 bridge not every pc could really do the original bridge, it was too steep a gradient.
The discretion is based on the pc's drug history and his ability to operate exterior.
Personally I feel that anyone who went Dianetic clear, if they don't have a heavy drug case, benefits greatly by doing the Original OT IV. It proofs up a being so they won't become effect of implants in the future.
Isn't there something that can be done about autormatic interruptions of the flow. I don't need in the middle of a sentence having some datum interjected that makes the sentence incomprehensible. See 2nd paragraph from the bottom.
Pat
Are you talking about this discussion thread Pat or on Roy's article?
Discussion thread. This was some time ago, first article I wrote. When I came to read it automatic inserts for source materials were interjected, spoiling the smoothness of the read.
I understand you like to have long uninterrupted text, but that is not very readable or interesting for most people. Using Headings and inserting links into the text make the topic more readable...IMO. You are free to publish however you wish but you could look at any Wikipedia article to see what I am talking about. That's what we are trying to emulate to a large degree.
I added the new field "Original OT-7 - New OT-7"
Hi. Do you have a field for Original OT IV, V, and VI as well as VII? Also VIII? I have someone auditing original OT IV now and someone on OT VIII.
Pat