Should this video be added?

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:LRH Videos
Jump to navigation Jump to search

OK. As you can see I posted as much of the YouTube link as would be necessary to identify the video. If you will copy that part and paste it in the url field over another YouTube video link you will see the video. Is that clear enough explanation?

Halvor Raknes (talk)17:00, March 3, 2020

test to see if youtube vids can be posted - they can - so...?

Dl88008 (talk)18:19, March 3, 2020

The vid you posted about is a news media (slanted/biased) expose and this site is not the place for those.

There are plenty of so-called "whistle-blower" sites about the church, Miscavige and LRH. We leave that to them.

Dl88008 (talk)18:32, March 3, 2020

Right, I hadn't watched it.

I now made an attempt to post the url and again it failed. So it seems you are allowed to do it and not me. Could it be a matter of user rights settings?

ETA: I have now watched the video, and I quite agree it is of little value except at an example of what a hit piece can look like. Seeing as the Vimeo video had in its title that it was the only LRH interview, I jumped at the discovery of another actual interview and figured maybe it might have been missed.

Halvor Raknes (talk)20:03, March 3, 2020

What exactly happens when you paste, or try to paste, a link on a page?

Dl88008 (talk)22:48, March 3, 2020

It simply returns me to edit mode until I remove the url.

Halvor Raknes (talk)16:39, March 4, 2020

Weird - I don't have an answer for that right now.

Dl88008 (talk)20:07, March 4, 2020

As a suggestion for debugging, create a test account and try and post a comment containing a url as a regular user.

Halvor Raknes (talk)19:34, March 5, 2020