Critique from Gayle Evans via Facebook PM
I like no LOVE the create, period. Now here is my critique yes?
1. FN Number 1 is a springy FN that eventually stops being springy 2. Instant FN looks stiff - not sweeping, lacks rhthym 3. JUST A NOTE: I know you said something about that being added in the next round or so but need to be consistent in my critiquing eh?! The following reads can't be properly critiqued without volume for me. Persistent FN Instant FN Null needle Stuck needle Stop 4. Change of Characteristic doesn't show it 5. Dirty Needle - suggestion, like you show with the FNs if you could show several DNs I think it would help ragged, jerky, ticking not sweeping and tends to be persistent...these little fellas need to be fully understood. I've cracked cases by following up on these during assessments to find bpc...often times a newer pc won't originate WHAT they want to say and so withhold it - first sign of that is that ticky needle. An auditor is to never go past this in an assessment and so I think that showing a few more of these little fellas could really be useful to training auditors. 6. The stage four: in the film it's bouncing on each end of the read when it doesn't in reality have any of that bounce in it at all.
I'm going to preface this next with it's just opinion based on my reaction and has nothing at all to do with technical:
didn't love the music and still don't like that sound used to fade out/in with the dials. This one sounds electrifying - zzzzzzzzt kind of sound.
The whole subject of auditing, making auditors, it's all about the spirit of man. That's a very uptone, sparkly, glittery, chimes and bells and upbeat uplifting matter. So it would be more paralleling the beauty of it with this reflected in it's lightness and beautiness that it creates and which it inspires.
You might consider NO music when the reads are being shown like EM 9 and EM9A.
There you be Mr. Burke. Take that and do what you will my friend.
Best to you and your co-creator thank you thank you thank you!
Gayle