Talk:What is Ron's Org
The Big Picture -- Dex Gelfand 13:21, 14 January 2012 (MST)[edit source]
Hello Max, thank you for this, and I hope you can have my response:
I have always been a supporter of Ron's Orgs. The person I have chosen, and completely trust, and used for my own solo auditor training and supervising, was trained through Class VIII at Ron's Org. On my own "Free Scientologist" Facebook group, which does include some Ron's Org devotees, I have made my admiration and respect for all that Ron's Orgs are and do known. On occasions where I have heard or observed others making degrading statements of Ron's Orgs, I have always pointed out that Ron's Orgs are the most productive Scientology organization on the planet, and that I've known many people who have at least done a portion of the CBR OT levels, and that not one of them complained about it.
What bothers me is your attitude and statement about what others choose to do- "cheap copies"- that is an opinion, and an offensive and degrading statement to many. I've learned enough about Idenics to respect it, also Knowledgism, Games Matrix Processing, and gained invaluable useful information from studying John McMasters' lectures on Power Processing, which, like it or not, give needed and important depth to understanding how to run Power, that is unavailable in LRH's materials.
I am a dedicated student of LRH material, I am always studying and learning from his lectures and books materials, going all the way back to 1950. I also take full advantage of learning from the researchers that Ron employed, worked with and learned from, and these include Alan Walters (Alan, founder of Knowledgism, is the creator of, among other things, the L1C), John Galusha (creator of Idenics, and a key researcher of engram running and creative processing for LRH), John McMasters (the main person involved in piloting and developing Power Processing) and others of similar importance. I do not demand that you embrace my path in order for me to support you, and I would ask that you grant the same to myself and others.
I grant beingness to all who study and apply any Scientology or Scientology-related materials for the benefit of themselves and/or others. I do understand that we all choose our particular means because we feel it is the best way to go. I don't think that this is an excuse to make degrading statements (like "cheap copies") about what others are having success with. This is one reason why, although I have not (at least so far) embraced the "CBR Bridge", I never condone the degrading statements made by others about it. (As I'm sure you know, there are those people who ridicule Bill Robertson and the OT Levels he is responsible for disseminating and implementing.)
I think that when a person degrades what others practice, he is contributing to the creation of a game whereby his own choice of practice will be similarly degraded, as well as that of others, and the end result is division and opposition, where none should exist. I think we should all be supportive of each other, while practicing and disseminating what each of us is personally excited about or committed to, and unless and until that happens, we will not see the kind of unity that you (and I) envision, and we will all be smaller and more vulnerable, and less effective.
Max, undeniably, you and your organization have done and are doing great things. So have others. My postulate and intention is that we create a bigger effect by doing great things together.
Love, Dex
Dexter Gelfand, Free Scientologist
Power Processing Specialist
http://community.freezone-tech.info/dexter/
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]